I believe new development should pay for the costs it creates. Existing residents should not be left paying for infrastructure that is required primarily because of new development. That can include roads, drainage, wastewater and other infrastructure or upgrades needed to support additional homes and residents. At the same time, not every project benefits only a new development. If an infrastructure improvement also addresses an existing problem or provides a broader benefit to West St. Paul, I think it is reasonable for the municipality to contribute an appropriate share. For me, growth paying for growth means identifying the actual costs created by development and making sure those costs are allocated fairly, rather than simply passing them on to existing taxpayers.

Developers should be responsible for the costs of services and infrastructure required to fully complete their developments. If Council identifies essential infrastructure needs—such as sidewalks, crosswalks, trail lighting, or green space—those costs should be the responsibility of the developer. New developments should be as self-sufficient as possible once completed, with the RM assuming responsibility for general maintenance (grass cutting, snow removal, etc.). Existing residents should not be expected to subsidize infrastructure required to enhance new developments. Cost-sharing should only occur when infrastructure has reached the end of its useful life and requires replacement or when there is a broader community benefit. This approach ensures growth pays its fair share while protecting the investments of residents who have already built our community.